- MICROSOFT WEB EXPRESSION 4 PROBLEMS INSTALL
- MICROSOFT WEB EXPRESSION 4 PROBLEMS PC
- MICROSOFT WEB EXPRESSION 4 PROBLEMS DOWNLOAD
Looks like the problem is the CSS background-url, not the element itself. It's not visible, but I can see in the DOM that it IS there. I can see there are some differences in size (note the red numbers in the lower left corner of the IE6 site) and also the kind of obvious fact that my blog's header totally doesn't show up on IE6. I can roll over the element in question and I get details synchronized between the two panes. The thing that I think makes SuperPreview different from the other techniques and a useful tool for my toolbox is its depth inspection and quick iteration of comparisons.Ībove, see how my site looks wrong in IE6? I can fire up SuperPreview and put Firefox 3.5 on the left and IE6 (or 7, or 8) on the right: You can also compare the site in the browser against a Photoshop comp. I wonder why? Depth - Look and Feel with SuperPreviewĮxpression Web SuperPreview (and the Free SuperPreview IE - 18megs) is a tool that makes it easy compare designs in multiple browsers side-by-side. Looks like my header doesn't show up in IE6! That's not good.
MICROSOFT WEB EXPRESSION 4 PROBLEMS PC
Here's IE6 running in Windows XP under a Virtual PC on my Windows 7 installation:
MICROSOFT WEB EXPRESSION 4 PROBLEMS DOWNLOAD
This download page contains different VPC images, depending on what you want to test. For IE6, IE7 or different versions of Windows, you can run Virtual Machines.ĪSIDE: A lot of people don't know that you can download five different virtual machines for Application Compatibility testing and run them in Virtual PC for free.
MICROSOFT WEB EXPRESSION 4 PROBLEMS INSTALL
You can always install a bunch of browsers, and everyone does this anyway. Depth - Interacting with Many Browsers or Virtual Machines It's not exactly "make change, hit reload." This is really cool stuff, and very powerful, but it's tedious and takes time.
These are services that typically run a farm of virtual machines that are setup a hit your site with a few dozens different versions of browsers, then they give you screenshots. I've used online tools like BrowserShots to basically run by website through several dozen browsers before and send me screenshots of how they all look. How does the site look across the big few browsers? What about the little several-dozen? You never know when someone running Iceweasel 2.0 or Kazehakase 0.5 is going to show up and complain. Here's what's good and bad about each: Breadth - Covering all Bases with a Screenshot Service
Lets you see what DOM elements align to what on screen You have to maintain a bunch of Virtual Machines, or a be aware lot of browser installations. You really get to see how your site looks and works on many browsers. No interaction with the browsers, no way to debug interactions. Gets you screenshots of your site on a million browsers and platforms All browsers have their quirks and older IEs have more than their fair share.Īs I see it, there's basically three main pillars of cross-browser testing: Most of the time you can follow standards and get a decent looking website working cross browser, but there's always variations.